At 09:20 AM 1/11/99 -0800, Greg Skinner wrote:
>jeff Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>For instance, it as a body or board, has allowed Mike Roberts (CEO)
>>and Joe Simms (Legal Council) to unfairly and in less than an open
>>manner, assist the DNSO.ORG in formulating the bylaws (Draft7) on a
>>mailing list that is CLOSED ( Participants List,
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]). Whose fault would this be Greg?
>
>As I understand it, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a list for people who
>attended meetings.
>
>If that list were open, it would be filled with flames, just like the
>other open lists.
I disagree with the notion that open lists get filled with flames.
While there have been some on the ORSC list, we have mechanisms in
place to prven them from geting out of hand. If you offend somebody,
you apologize or you're removed. After 3 strikes, you may be barred
from the list. The exact rules can be found at
http://www.open-rsc.org/lists/rules/
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is even more rigid; much more so,
yet is an open list (despite the fact they don't think it is.
Screw up once on that list and you're toast.
http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/easley/mercedes/listrules.html
Is there consensus that the IFWP list should have some sort of
rule structure that cuts down on the crap ?
--
"To find out what your opponent is up to, look at what he
says about you" - unknown
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
