On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 08:08:58AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know many refuse to accept this, but the old InterNIC was
> a hybrid site involving both registry (DNS) and registrar
> (customer) functions and it is very easy to establish that
> most of the functions on the InterNIC site were registrar
> related.  InterNIC was not a registry.

The question of whether the Internic was a registry or a registrar is
totally irrelevant -- more of the disingenuous obfuscation that you 
dispense so expertly.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain

Reply via email to