At 08:08 AM 3/25/99 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I know many refuse to accept this, but the old InterNIC was
>a hybrid site involving both registry (DNS) and registrar
>(customer) functions and it is very easy to establish that
>most of the functions on the InterNIC site were registrar
>related. InterNIC was not a registry. There was no
>registry, but there will be shortly.
Chuck,
Every now and again, someone delivers a stellar line that lives forever. I
suspect that your "There was no registry" will be one of them.
It wanders so broadly between fantasy, revisionistic history, and accurate
summary of the difficulties with NSI's service, that I can only hope the
rest of the community embraces the utterance as enthusiastically as I do.
Thank you.
d/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker Tel: +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting Fax: +1 408 273 6464
675 Spruce Drive <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
