William and all,
Nope. Maybe you could suggest some legally alternative
language...
William X. Walsh wrote:
> Am I the only domain holder here that find this clause absolutely
> unacceptable?
>
> On Sun, 25 Apr 1999 07:15:59 -0400, "A.M. Rutkowski"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >This standard indemnification provision applies to the
> >Second Level Domain registrants vis-a-vis NSIRegistry.Net.
> >It simply says that if the SLD does something that results
> >in NSIRegistry.net getting dragged as a third party into
> >litigation as a result of the SLD's action, that SLD will pay
> >NSIRegistry.net's related costs. It is entirely reasonable
> >and appropriate, and I expect that every registrar will
> >have a similar provision regarding themselves and SLD
> >registrants.
> >
> >
> >
> >--tony
>
> --
> William X. Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> General Manager, DSo Internet Services
>
> NSI & Internic news http://www.dso.net/internic/
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
