Roberto In message <B3B34AF18759D011A2C500805FD25AF1018A1639@EMAIL1>, Roberto Gaetano writes: > This said, Jay may raise a legitimate problem, which is representation of > administrators of domain space of level >1 (SLD, 3LD, ...). I have said as much. Most of them would fall under the commercial constituency, of course. > While these people can indeed bring added value to the discussion, their > inclusion in either the ccTLD or gTLD constituency does not seem > appropriate, unless we redefine the scope of the constituencies to include > Domains other than Top Level. It's not domains that are included in constituencies, it is Domain Managers (That's RFC 1591for Registries) el
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status R... Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status R... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status R... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status R... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Repor... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status R... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Michael Sondow
- [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Onno Hovers
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- RE: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Roberto Gaetano
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- RE: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Marsh, Miles (Gene)