On Fri, 7 May 1999, Esther Dyson wrote: > Thanks for your comments. AS noted, we have not yet decided what we will > do. It indeed depends on public comments, among other things. But aside from > our process, do you have any comments on the substance of the WIPO report? > We would welcome those. Hello Esther, Both Jay and myself have previously requested that you might answer the questions that Jay originally submitted regarding Mike Roberts report to GAC. Any chance that you might have the time to do that? Thank you. /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Patrick Greenwell Telocity http://www.telocity.com (tinc) Coming to the ISPF? The Forum for ISPs by ISPs http://www.ispf.com \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
- Re: Criterion for placement ... Kent Crispin
- Re: Criterion for placement ... A.M. Rutkowski
- RE: Criterion for placement ... John B. Reynolds
- RE: Criterion for placement ... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: Criterion for placement ... Kent Crispin
- RE: Criterion for placement ... John B. Reynolds
- Re: Criterion for placement ... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Standard for bei... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Standard for bei... Carl Oppedahl
- Re: [dnsproc-en] Re: [IFWP] ... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN and WIPO in Berlin [ATTENTION ES... Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN and WIPO in Berlin [ATTENTIO... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN and WIPO in Berlin Bret A. Fausett
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN and WIPO in Berlin dstein
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN and WIPO in Berlin Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN and WIPO in Berlin Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN and WIPO in Berlin Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN and WIPO in Berlin Jay Fenello
- RE: [IFWP] ICANN and WIPO in Berlin Marsh, Miles (Gene)
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN and WIPO in Berlin Ellen Rony
- [IFWP] Re: ICANN and WIPO in Berlin Onno Hovers