At 10:35 PM 5/15/99 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>But the preemptive "spin" given this case by Mr. Rutkowski raises a more
>interesting question:
>
>Mr. Rutkowski, are you presently retained by NSI as a lawyer?
For a very long time, Tony refused to acknowledge publicly that he received
compensation from NSI. Finally he allowed as how he had been hired by them
to do a small amount of work, but claims that his public contributions to
these lists are not at their behest. Still, the pattern of his
interpretations and defense on their behalf is utterly consistent.
>If the answers to the first two questions are no, are you working on spec,
>relying merely on publicly available info?
He has a consistent pattern of offering claims of legal outcomes which
vastly exceed any available data. It's been particularly amusing to see
him do this about assorted ITU issues, when the documents he cites have
nothing at all to do with the thing he is claiming.
d/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker Tel: +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting Fax: +1 408 273 6464
675 Spruce Drive <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
