Tony would you mind asking his question? In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "A.M. Rutkowski" writes: > Marty, > > I am not in any way speaking on behalf of or as a surrogate for > Network Solutions. I am simply speaking as an interested analyst - > as I have for many years - with personal views as to desirable > directions on these issues and the facts as I see them. He didn't ask that. He asked whether you are presently being retained as laywer by NSI? Are you? I'll help you by making it multiple choice: Yes/No/Don't Know el
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Ken Freed
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI martys
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investiga... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investiga... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
