In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, the K*nt writes: > On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 05:23:58PM -0400, A.M. Rutkowski wrote: > > At 03:48 PM 5/16/99 , you wrote: > > >He asked whether you are presently being retained as laywer by NSI? > > > > > >Are you? > > > > > >I'll help you by making it multiple choice: Yes/No/Don't Know > > > > NO > > > > --tony > > You tell 'em Tony! I don't know that a "laywer" is, but it sounded > vaguely obscene. Now I can't claim that that was intentional, more a typo in my second, third (or was it fourth?) language, buy you are right for a change, it does sound vaguely obscene. But then so is his profession. Now, must someone ask him whether he is presently retained in any capacity by NSI? el
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investiga... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investiga... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Jeff Williams
