On Tue, 18 May 1999, Bill Lovell wrote: > The US District Court for the District of Columbia agreed that it > was a tax but said that Congress could retroactively authorize it, > which lawmakers did later that month. This most of all, is particularly appalling.... /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Patrick Greenwell Telocity http://www.telocity.com (408) 863-6617 v (tinc) (408) 777-1451 f \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
- [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to spend the $62 mill... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to spend the... Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to spend... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to s... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to spend... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to spend... Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to s... Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how ... Dave Farber
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how ... Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to spend the... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to spend the... Gordon Cook
