>> It seems to me that the ccTLDs want to have it both ways, >> no regulation from their governments and no regulation from the ICANN. > >That may be the case for some ccTLDs, but it's definitely not the case >for all. The name authority for the NO (Norway) ccTLD, for instance, is >explicitly cooperating with the government (among others). > >Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is a difference between co-operating with the government (especially if it is among others) and being regulated by the government. One is multilateral, one is unilateral. Antony
- RE: [IFWP] The CORE plot thickens ... Re: [announce] Registrars ... Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] The CORE plot thickens ... Re: [announce] Regist... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The CORE plot thickens ... Re: [announce] Re... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The CORE plot thickens ... Re: [announce... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The CORE plot thickens ... Re: [announce... Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] The CORE plot thickens ... Re: [announce... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The CORE plot thickens ... Re: [announce... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] The CORE plot thickens ... Re: [announce... Anonymous
- [IFWP] Re: Registrars Constituency Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] The CORE plot thickens ... Re: [announce] Regist... Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] The CORE plot thickens ... Re: [announce] Regist... Anonymous
