>I think Mr. Lovell was referring to the description of attorneys. > >I am referring to the fact that first-come, first-serve doesn't recognize >trademark or other rights as they apply to the use/registration of words. >dc But the law is not that they need to, which is similar to many other areas of naming things. Therefore, it seems to take US law into effect just fine. Any restrictions on *registration* would then be new law given that current law stops infringement on the Internet in the same way as it stops infringement in other media.
- [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity Bill Lovell
- [Attention Diane Cabell] to: Re: [IFWP]... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity Richard J. Sexton