>I think Mr. Lovell was referring to the description of attorneys.
>
>I am referring to the fact that first-come, first-serve doesn't recognize
>trademark or other rights as they apply to the use/registration of words.
>dc

But the law is not that they need to, which is similar to many other areas
of naming things.  Therefore, it seems to take US law into effect just
fine.  Any restrictions on *registration* would then be new law given that
current law stops infringement on the Internet in the same way as it stops
infringement in other media.


Reply via email to