Diane and all,
Ahhh! Interesting point Diane. But than again why should first come first
serve recognize TM's as they may or may not relate to a TM? For
instance a derivative of a TM such as fordproparts.com as that would
relate to FORD.COM. Our your example Taurus.com as that
might relate to the Taurus ford model of car (TM). Or even better
still Taurus.org (Non-commercial)...
Diane Cabell wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mikki Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 8:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [IFWP] Trademark Stupidity
>
> > >At 11:47 PM 7/5/99 -0400, Bill Lovell wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Hey, you engineering wonks had first shot at the naming policy. It
> just
> > >>didn't take US law into account so now we overbearing know-it-alls have
> to
> > >>come in and clean up the mess.
> > >>
> > >>Diane Cabell
> > >>http://www.mama-tech.com
> > >>Fausett, Gaeta & Lund
> > >>Boston
> > >>
> > >Hey, Diane! Well put!
> >
> > Wait a minute.....where doesn't it take US law into account?
>
> I think Mr. Lovell was referring to the description of attorneys.
>
> I am referring to the fact that first-come, first-serve doesn't recognize
> trademark or other rights as they apply to the use/registration of words.
> dc
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
