Kent Crispin wrote:

> > Assuming that there is no question about the authenticity of the voters,
> > the voting website could be duplicated , or even triplicated at several
> > trusted third-party locations.
>
> That's a good idea.  Right now the IDNO voting software is *not*
> being run by a trusted third party at all -- it is being run by a
> partisan to the debates.
>

Please expand upon these two issues (including proposed implementation):

1.  Use of "trusted third parties;" and

2.  Use of multiple vote counting sites.


Reply via email to