Kent Crispin wrote: > > Assuming that there is no question about the authenticity of the voters, > > the voting website could be duplicated , or even triplicated at several > > trusted third-party locations. > > That's a good idea. Right now the IDNO voting software is *not* > being run by a trusted third party at all -- it is being run by a > partisan to the debates. > Please expand upon these two issues (including proposed implementation): 1. Use of "trusted third parties;" and 2. Use of multiple vote counting sites.
- Re: [IFWP] Voter aut... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Voter... Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
- Re: [IFWP] Voter... Mark C. Langston
- Re: [IFWP] ... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] ... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IF... Mark C. Langston
- Re: [IF... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Voter authenticat... Jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Voter authentication Joop Teernstra
- Re: [IFWP] Voter authenticat... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Voter authent... Weisberg
- Re: [IFWP] Voter aut... Mark C. Langston
- Re: [IFWP] Voter aut... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Voter... Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
- Re: [IFWP] ... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IF... Weisberg
- Re: [IF... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IF... Weisberg
- Re: [IFWP] ... Kent Crispin
- RE: [IFWP] Voter authentication R . Gaetano
- Re: [IFWP] Voter authenticat... Mark C. Langston
