Mark Langston wrote:
> On 19 July 1999, Weisberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >Kent Crispin wrote:
> >
> >> That's a good idea. Right now the IDNO voting software is *not*
> >> being run by a trusted third party at all -- it is being run by a
> >> partisan to the debates.
> >>
> >
> >Please expand upon these two issues (including proposed
> implementation):
> >
> >1. Use of "trusted third parties;" and
> >
> >2. Use of multiple vote counting sites.
>
> And while you're answering questions Kent, would you explain why you
> hold the IDNO to a higher standard than the working groups and the
> pDNC?
I can give you mine.
The problem is that we were talking of the vote at IDNO as an example for
the electronic vote for the elections of the ICANN Board.
Maybe I should not, but I personally tend to care less about how an election
in a working group is held, and more on how "the" ICANN election is held.
Kent is stating that he would not consider Joop as a "trusted third party"
for the ICANN Board election. If I interpret correctly your posting, I think
that you don't consider Javier fit for the purpose either ;>).
Personal considerations aside, I think that we need to find a way that
satisfies everybody, and that everybody can trust.
Regards
Roberto
