Frankly, it's amazing to watch the politics
involved in selecting the witnesses for the
upcoming hearings.
Thankfully, I have information that suggests
that the details as reported yesterday by
News.com are not correct.
Jay.
At 09:21 AM 7/20/99 , Gordon Cook wrote:
>JESUS.....five against one in the definites....... scary......
>
>>According to News.com, the following witnesses will
>>testify at Thursday's hearing on the Domain Name
>>System Privatization: Is ICANN Out of Control?
>>
>>http://www.house.gov/commerce/schedule.htm
>>
>>� America Online,
>>� Information Technology Association of America,
>>� Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
>>� Network Solutions
>>� Richard Forman, chief executive of Register.com,
>>� Ken Stubbs, chairman of CORE
>>
>>These witnesses are tentatively scheduled:
>>
>>� Jamie Love, director of the Consumer Project on Technology,
>>� Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform,
>>� Jonathan Weinberg, a law professor at Wayne State University,
>>� Jonathan Zittrain, executive director at the Berkman Center,
>>� Mikki Barry, president of the Domain Name Rights Coalition
>>
>>While this committee got a good mix of panelists
>>and perspectives, they are grouped in an unfortunate
>>order, and the second group is only tentative. That
>>means that ICANN has been given home field advantage.
>>
>>Isn't that interesting?
>>
>>
>>Respectfully,
>>
>>Jay Fenello
>>President, Iperdome, Inc. 404-943-0524
>>-----------------------------------------------
>>What's your .per(sm)? http://www.iperdome.com
>
>****************************************************************
>The COOK Report on Internet Index to seven years of the COOK Report
>431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA http://cookreport.com
>(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) The only Good ICANN is a Dead ICANN
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] What's Behind ICANN and How it Will
>Impact the Future of the Internet http://cookreport.com/icannregulate.shtml
>****************************************************************
>
