>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:    Non-member submission from ["Roeland M.J. Meyer" 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]   
>Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 22:43:13 -0400 (EDT)
>
>>From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue Jul 20 22:43:11 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: from condor.lvrmr.mhsc.com (condor.lvrmr.mhsc.com [199.108.175.226])
>       by ns1.vrx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B70F03A
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 20 Jul 1999 22:43:10 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from hawk (hawk.lvrmr.mhsc.com [199.108.175.236])
>       by condor.lvrmr.mhsc.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id TAA11745;
>       Tue, 20 Jul 1999 19:36:30 -0700
>Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Michael Sondow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>       "Joop Teernstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] ICANN Membership
>Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 19:36:29 -0700
>Message-ID: <00a601bed321$d6878620$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>       charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
>In-reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
>Importance: Normal
>
>> Behalf Of Michael Sondow
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 1999 7:10 PM
>
>> Joop Teernstra a �crit:
>> >
>> > When did I oppose that?  Is that not the formulation of the
>> Paris Draft,
>> > that I supported?
>>
>> No, I distinctly recall the ICIIU criterion - that only domain name
>> holders become members - was repudiated by all and sundry.
>
>I kinda disagree. I supported it. Although it may have gotten lost in
>the flurry. Not many of us supported it, as I recall. I brought it up in
>the early IDNO talks too. The issue is future DN holders, those who
>don't yet have a DN. I still don't quite agree, but what they want is
>more open than that. Albeit, not as deliverable.
>
>
>
--
Richard Sexton  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | http://dns.vrx.net/tech/rootzone
http://killifish.vrx.net    http://www.mbz.org    http://lists.aquaria.net
Bannockburn, Ontario, Canada,  70 & 72 280SE, 83 300SD   +1 (613) 473-1719

Reply via email to