I thought I must have missed something :-)
> Ivan,
>
> You wrote:
> >
> > Jay,
> > You really don't get it, do you? The Reuters story is about
> > ICANN dropping
> > the $1 fee and opening up its board meetings. I don't think
> > the journalist
> > set out to examine the history or future of the namespace.
> > When people start shouting about media bias you wonder how
> > long it is before
> > they start claiming that the journalists are being controlled
> > by secret rays
> > from space.
> > Get real - this is standard journalism.
> > Ivan
> >
>
> It seems to me that *you* don't get it!
>
> The point that Jay is making is that *any* story about ICANN
> that is not
> focused on their attempt to take over the Internet and the supposed
> IAHC/CORE/ITU conspiracy *is* biased journalism ;>).
>
> Regards
> Roberto
>
