---- without comment --------------------------------------------------------

http://europa.eu.int/rapid/cgi/rapcgi.ksh?p_action.gettxt=gt&doc=IP/99/596|0
|RAPID&lg=EN

(User name: guest, Password: guest)

--------------------------------------

Commission investigates Internet agreements under EU competition rules

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
DN: IP/99/596     Date: 1999-07-29


TXT: FR EN DE
PDF: FR EN DE
Word Processed: FR EN DE

IP/99/596

Brussels, 29 July 1999

Commission investigates Internet agreements under EU competition rules

The European Commissioner responsible for competition, Mr Karel Van Miert,
has ordered his services to look into the licensing agreements between
Network Solutions Inc. (NSI) and test bed registrars of second-level
Internet domain names in the .com, .org and .net domains. These licensing
agreements are set to be temporary and to be amended and approved by the
United States (US) Department of Commerce before the end of the test bed
period, which now postponed until 16 July 1999, instead of 25 June 1999.
This new anti-trust inquiry is part of an overall monitoring of on-going
developments in the management of generic Top-Level Domain Names such as
.com and of the Commission's efforts to guarantee the openness of the
Internet.

Mr Van Miert wants to ascertain whether the licensing agreements fall within
the scope of Article 81 (1) EC Treaty (formerly Article 85 (1) of the
founding Treaty of Rome) and of Article 53 of the European Economic Area
(EEA) Agreement, which prohibit agreements restrictive of competition.
Certain provisions in the agreements or related actions taken by NSI might
also constitute an abuse of NSI's dominant position under Article 82 EC
Treaty (formerly Article 85 (1) of the founding Treaty of Rome) and Article
54 of the EEA Agreement.

The Commission's Directorate-General for Competition (DG IV) has informed
the US Department of Justice (US DoJ) and the US Department of Commerce (US
DoC) that it has opened a procedure enclosing a number of concerns and
questions related to the licensing agreements as well as details on some
recent related developments in the Internet field. DG IV hopes that raising
such questions and concerns regarding the current standard NSI-Registrar
Licensing Agreement will help the US DoC in its negotiations with NSI
regarding its review.

DG IV wrote to Ms Becky Burr, Associate Administrator of the Office of
International Affairs within the National Telecommunications & Information
Administration of the US DoC, on 21 June 1999. In that letter, DG IV stated
its awareness of the US DoC joint efforts together with ICANN to create a
competitive environment for the registration of second-level domain names in
the generic Top-Level Domains and its full support of such efforts. In
particular, DG IV expressed concerns related to:


the lack of safeguards to prevent NSI registry from discriminating against
competing registrars in favour of NSI registrar;

the fact that NSI as a registrar is not subject to the conditions and
obligations set out in ICANN accreditation agreements and NSI-Registrar
Licensing agreements, as NSI has not been accredited by ICANN as a
registrar. However, DG IV believes that NSI should be required to get
accreditation from ICANN and be subject at least to the same obligations as
competing registrars as stemming from those accreditation rules;

certain requirements to enter the market, e.g. a performance bond of USD
100,000, which could constitute barriers to market entry; and

the domain names portability rules and NSI's related policy, which DGIV
believes could act as strong deterrents for SLD holders to transfer their
SLD to another competing registrar.
Mr Van Miert decided to open an informal inquiry after receiving a number of
informal complaints against the licensing agreements itself, against
problems in the implementation of the agreements and against alleged abuses
of a dominant position by NSI. DG IV will investigate these allegations in
close co-operation with the US DoJ whilst continuing to fully monitor NSI's
operations with a view to ensuring that EU competition rules are respected.

Background

The Internet Domain Name System maps user-friendly names onto the difficult
to remember numbers that identify computers connected to the Internet. For
commercial organisations on the Internet, the .com generic Top Level Domain
(gTLD) is the most important and most widely used, in comparison with
country code Top Level Domains (ccTLD) such as .be or .fr, and is
increasingly valued while e-commerce is taking off.

Until beginning of October 98, the gTLDs system was operated by the Internet
Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) and Network Solutions Inc. (NSI), the
latter under contract from the US Government (USG) (the NSI-USG co-operative
agreement), acting as a monopolistic registry and registrar of .com, .net
and .org world-wide. The registry functions consists in the operation (e.g.
administration, maintenance and up-dating) of the database into which
registrants details as well as the second-level domains details are
registered. The registrar function consists in the registration in that
database and allocation of second-level domain names to registrants, as well
as all related marketing, billing and other related activities.

As provided for in the US Government's White Paper, a private not-for-profit
corporation called ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers) was incorporated in the US on 1 October 1998 to administer policy
for the Internet Name and Address System and succeed to IANA in that role.

The NSI-USG co-operative agreement expired at the end of September 1998, and
was renewed while amended on 7 October 1998, for a period running until 30
September 2000, by so-called 'Amendment 11', which set out a first timetable
for a stepwise liberalisation of the registration system for gTLDs.

The timetable under which the stepwise liberalisation was to be implemented
was amended twice, first through Amendment 12 on 12 March 1999, and further
on 25 June 1999 by the US DoC. Thereafter, NSI was by 26 April 1999 to
establish a test bed supporting actual registrations in .com, .net, and .org
with 5 registrars to be accredited by ICANN ("Test bed Registrars") (Phase
1) by that date in accordance with ICANN's published accreditation
guidelines. Phase 2 with an unlimited number of competing registrars to be
accredited by ICANN ("Accredited Registrars") is currently set to start on
16 July 1999.

That liberalisation is to be implemented thanks to a system called the
Shared Registration System ("SRS"). To implement this system and allow for
competing registrars, NSI was (directly or indirectly) to develop a protocol
and associated software supporting a system that permits multiple registrars
to provide registration services for the registry of the existing gTLDs.

The licensing by NSI to registrars of such protocol and software is the
purpose of the NSI-registrar standard licensing agreement published on 21
April 1999 by the US Department of Commerce (US DoC) as an annex to
Amendment 13 to the NSI-USG co-operative agreement.

On the basis of that standard Licensing agreement, NSI has entered into
agreements with the five test bed registrars selected and accredited by
ICANN. These licensing agreements are aimed at enabling the latter to
register second-level domain names within the registry of Top-Level Domain
Names managed by NSI such as .com, .org and .net. Thereby NSI licences to
those companies the necessary software, application programming interfaces
and protocols enabling these companies to access the NSI Shared Registry
System.

DGIV has identified a certain number of clauses in that standard
NSI-Registrar licensing agreement that may raise anti-competitive concerns.

Under Amendment 13 to the NSI-US Government Co-operative Agreement of 21
April 1999, this standard agreement is intended for being used only during
the test-bed period (Phase I).

Apart from the five test bed registrars, ICANN has approved until now
fifty-two other companies to be accredited as registrars. These companies
also include a number of EEA based companies. As of 9 July 1999, still only
two out of the five test bed Registrars have started offering registration
services.

---- END without comment --------------------------------------------------

--
Jim Dixon                                                 Managing Director
VBCnet GB Ltd                http://www.vbc.net        tel +44 117 929 1316
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Member of Council                               Telecommunications Director
Internet Services Providers Association                       EuroISPA EEIG
http://www.ispa.org.uk                              http://www.euroispa.org
tel +44 171 976 0679                                    tel +32 2 503 22 65

Reply via email to