yeah, I do remember when you called me....must have been at least 2
years ago.... you sounded dreadfully reasonable.... It took other
people at least 4 to 6 weeks to convince me that you were part crazy
alternic/edns crowd and therefore not taken seriously....
This stuff is far to much off a multi-headed hydra to be grasped readily.....
which is why esther dyson can get away with singing praise to the net
with one hand while cutting our collective throats with the other.
by turning herself into the leading shill for the agents of corporate
and government control, etsee is indeed refashioning her role in
history
> >Thank you - and none taken that way Jay, I assure you. I see your point,
> >but don't necessarily agree. OK, editors etc are the conduits through which
> >the ICANN story must flow, and cortrect me if I'm wrong, you're saying
> >they're not letting the story get out because they're part of a conspiracy
> >to suppress the truth, whatever that may be in this case? Is that your
> >point, or have I over simplified it?
>
>Well, lok at it this way, how many years has it taken to
>convince a very smalll handful of reporters that "things
>are not as they seem" (Maybe Gordon will recoup the
>first time I called him) yes we've been unable to
>educate any editors.
>
>
>
>This program posts news to thousands of machines throughout the entire
>civilized world. Your message will cost the net hundreds if not thousands of
>dollars to send everywhere. Please be sure you know what you are doing.
>
>Are you absolutely sure that you want to do this? [ny]
****************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet Index to seven years of the COOK Report
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA http://cookreport.com
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) The only Good ICANN is a Dead ICANN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] What's Behind ICANN and How it Will
Impact the Future of the Internet http://cookreport.com/icannregulate.shtml
****************************************************************
