On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> Karl and Patrick,
>
> The "consensus" in Berlin was so rough, that I can still see my abrasions.
Joop,
Thank you for the view of what occured in Berlin.
Even had there been consensus in Berlin, which, from your account there
wasn't, the far more important issue is that no consensus call or vote was
taken from those not physically present in Berlin.
One can only wonder what miniscule percentage of participants in this
arena were present in Berlin vs. the total number including those not
physically present.
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell
"This is our time. It will not come again."
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
- [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws Joop Teernstra
- [IFWP] Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] The rough consensus in Be... Patrick Greenwell
- [IFWP] Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] The rough consensus in Be... Jeff Williams
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN'... R . Gaetano
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] RE: [IFWP] The rough consens... Joop Teernstra
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and IC... Michael Froomkin
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin an... Jeff Williams
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and IC... Gene Marsh
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN'... cgomes
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and IC... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and IC... Jeff Williams
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and IC... Gene Marsh
