At 09:39 AM 8/9/99 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >"Poor management of the testbed by NSI?" I know that there have been lots >of emotionally based claims to this effect but would be interested to see >some objective facts. Especially considering Roberto was at the last testbed advisory committee meeting and I don't recall that either he or anyone else made such an assertion... :-) --tony
- [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws Joop Teernstra
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN'... Patrick Greenwell
- [IFWP] Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] The rough consensus in Be... Jeff Williams
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN'... R . Gaetano
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] RE: [IFWP] The rough consens... Joop Teernstra
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and IC... Michael Froomkin
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin an... Jeff Williams
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and IC... Gene Marsh
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN'... cgomes
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and IC... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and IC... Jeff Williams
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and IC... Gene Marsh
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN'... R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and IC... A.M. Rutkowski
- [IFWP] RE: The scope of NDAs Jon Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin an... Werner Staub
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN'... R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN'... Ivan Pope
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and IC... A.M. Rutkowski
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN'... cgomes