> I remain worried about our ability to review hundreds or even
> thousands of comments fast enough. It's hard, and we may be pushed
> to our limits by the Santiago time zone...
Your half-dozen references to *time* constraints make one wonder
what the perceived benefit is of forcing these complicated issues
into such an arbitrary box -- when the object of the exercise
continues to be available 24/7 for just the kind of communicative
review, interpretation and agreement which everyone wishes to be
achieved.
Has the Berkman Center put its collective mind to work on this
conundrum?
======
BTW, Diane's remark ("Berlin had a heavy turnout") reminded me I
have yet to see even the vaguest approximations of attendance at
any of the live meetings. What kind of heaviness are we talking
about?
kerry
---
6: it seems a good use of the meeting's time for your agreement
14: it's expected that there will be a time crunch in this meeting as
in all prior sessions.
24: considering similar thoughts together ... to make time for, say,
37: they'd scroll by and she wouldn't have time to recognize them
and they'd be "lost."
71: in order to give everyone time to be heard/ read, it's crucial
that a few individuals not submit half the comments.
