Diane and all,
I guess this depends on what you call efficient. In terms or relation
to cost $$, it is VERY efficient. I would argue that in terms of time
E-Mail is also Very efficient, as well. I can respond to allot of E-Mails
in the time it takes me to fly to Santiago, Boston, or singapore, for instance,
for a F-toF meeting and back... However your mileage may very... >;)
BUt your point to some extent is well taken. I have suggested on more
than once occasion that using interactive internet video conferencing
would be much more encompassing...
Diane Cabell wrote:
> The Net is in awfully early days of its use outside of academic and largely
> US/English language settings. You seem to be saying that what was good enough
> for the Wright Brothers is good enough for today's air traveller. I don't buy
> it, and I find e-mail far less efficient a means of communication than
> face-to-face meetings.
> dc
>
> Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>
> > >I believe that many people on working committees simply do not find e-mail
> > >adequate to the task.
> >
> > If it wasn't adequate, the Internet would not exist; it's how we
> > got this far.
>
> Diane Cabell
> http://www.mama-tech.com
> Fausett, Gaeta & Lund, LLP
> Boston, MA
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
