On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, David Farber wrote:
> >>To: David Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Esther Dyson)
> >>Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 09:18:26 -0400
> >>
> >>WHy does it need to be ICANN itself who does this? Does no one else have
> >>the right to correct misconceptions? <g>
Probably because few people view it as a misconception.
> >>Regardless, may I please ask you on behalf of ICANN to avoid the use of
> >>oversight in referring to ICANN outside of direct quotes? (By all means
> >>please send this to the list.)
Well, most people have recognized that what you are attempting is Internet
Governance, so the term "oversight" seems quite appropriate. It's really
time to drop the pretenses. They are tired, and very worn out.
I do notice that your message didn't use the magic buzzword "consensus" in
it once. You're slipping... <g>
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell
"This is our time. It will not come again."
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
