"Richard J. Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll save you the trouble. It can be summarized as "Icann has a few > warts on it, but it's the only option". > You'll also hear a lot of "I'm tired of this and I don't really > care any more", "if we don't the ITU will take over" and > "...working within the system". Basically, you're saying what I said before. People may not be happy with ICANN, but they don't want to change the status quo. --gregbo
- [IFWP] gotta go, but ... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] gotta go, but ... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] gotta go, but ... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] gotta go, but ... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] gotta go, but ... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] gotta go, but ... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] gotta go, but ... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] gotta go, but ... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] gotta go, but .... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] gotta go, but ... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] gotta go, but ... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] gotta go, but ... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] gotta go, but ... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] gotta go, but ... Richard J. Sexton