Joe and all, Yes it seems to be being censored for reasons I have yet to see an announcement on to date. One has to wonder why? Is the DNSO and ICANN afraid of something perhaps? One also has to wonder why the NTIA/DOC has not exercised it's authority under the principals of the white paper here as well? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello: > > I am writing to you concerning the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list of which you and I > are members. The list is being censored. The only address capable of > transmitting messages to the list is [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This is a disgrace, and to Elisabeth Porteneuve and all those involved > I say shame. > > Until such time as this serious issue is fixed - I suggest everyone use > the ifwp list to communicate. That list is not censored and the same > ga issues are discussed there. For further information see ... > > http://lists.ifwp.org/ > > I also remind all of you, and members of the NC and ICANN board that > having a censored list, or a list on which games are played, does not > inspire confidence in this process. > > Regards > Joe Baptista > > Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!) CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
