>I'm curious about something. Many of you have probably seen the
>register.com commericals, where they have people touting the domains
>they've registered (e.g., sisterearth.com, hydrowatts.com, thefabers.com).
>Checking the whois database, of course, reveals all these domains are
>actually owned by register.com.
>
>Particularly in the case of thefabers.com, what recourse would a family
>with the last name of Faber have against this blatant squatting?
>These domains that register.com are using are not tied to or
>representative of any 'product or service', except that they are
>domain names, and register.com sells domain names.
>
>Would someone have a case to take these domains away from register.com
>under the UDRP? What are the implications should the arbiters decide
>that register.com deserves to keep these names?
Of course not. Register.com is a large company. Therefore, they
will win under the UDRP. Don't you yet understand how this works?
