>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from [Ronda Hauben ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] >Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:36:13 -0400 (EDT) > >>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 13 12:36:12 2000 >Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Received: from sawasdee.cc.columbia.edu (sawasdee.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.136]) > by ns1.vrx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6581BF136 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:36:11 -0400 (EDT) >Received: (from rh120@localhost) > by sawasdee.cc.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA06468; > Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:36:08 -0400 (EDT) >Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:36:08 -0400 (EDT) >From: Ronda Hauben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Who Can Watch the Watchdog? On the GAO-ICANN Report > > > Who Can Watch the Watchdog? > The GAO Report on ICANN is Issued > by Ronda Hauben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Friday, July 7, 2000 the US Government Accounting Office > (GAO-ICANN) posted their report....The report is an interesting > report, both in what it does and what it doesn't do.... > > One of the essential issues the GAO raises is whether the U.S. > government has the authority to transfer government property or > functions to a private non profit corporation. This is an important > question in view of the U.S. government plan to transfer key > assets of the Internet infrastructure to a private corporation. The > GAO Report notes that the Department of Commerce "states that no > government functions or property have been transferred" under its > agreements with ICANN..... > > See http://www.heise.de/tp/english/inhalt/te/8369/1.html > > > > > > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ph-1.613.473.1719 It's about travel on expense accounts to places with good beer. - BKR
