Well to counter your argument I would say that I went to IFWP meetings all over
the globe, went to an ICANN meeting or two. I worked on the at-large issue in
good faith in the first Membership Advisory Committee. I believe I was very awake
during the entire process, with gusts to diligent. What did all that work get?
not much I think. I am not funded to work on lost causes. Those that go to
Montevideo are funded to act and more than a couple of them will have a pre-set
agenda. Unless you want to fund everyone on this list to show up and make a
presence felt, I think sleeping is the more economical course.
Marc Schneiders wrote:
> Why we should wake up fast? Quite a few people are on their way to
> Montevideo right now. A couple of them may try to determine a lot of
> things on their own there without real input from those affected. The
> ALSC preliminary report leaves not much hope for a change to the
> better. Now, if it would be a good, thorough, well argued report, in
> which the basic assumptions are somewhat defended, one might hope that
> some discussion is possible. But it isn't, is it?
>
> This list of course does not have to wake up. But it might.
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, at 22:51 [=GMT-0400], Dan Steinberg wrote:
>
> > and why is that?
> >
> > Marc Schneiders wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, at 17:46 [=GMT-0400], John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D. wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: "Marc Schneiders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Just a test.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Shhh.... we are napping.
> > >
> > > Some may want you (plural) to wake up, fast...
> >
> > --
> > Dan Steinberg
> >
> > SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
> > 35, du Ravin phone: (613) 794-5356
> > Chelsea, Quebec fax: (819) 827-4398
> > J9B 1N1 e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
--
Dan Steinberg
SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec fax: (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1 e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
