Hello Einar,
The funny thing about this medium is that while I have no idea who you are,
you feel entitled to ask me all kinds of questions without introducing
yourself. If this were the phone, I doubt I'd take your call...;-)
Regards,
Joanna
on 9/9/01 8:19 PM, Einar Stefferud at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On what basis are you running for an ICANN BoD seat?
> On reading a few lines of your candidate statement, I note that you
> call for many of the same things that the IFWP (and the ORSC) called
> for long long ago in a meeting far far away (in Singapore;-)...
>
> What makes you think that you can have any significant influence on
> getting ICANN to reverse course and adopt any of you ideas?
>
> Its BoD is moribund, and has turning into a deaf and dumb rubber stamp.
>
> My view is that the proper thing to do with ICANN is let it throw
> itself off a cliff, without anyone trying to stoop it from doing so.
>
> As for this IFWP list, I dearly hope it does not turn into yet
> another ICANN subcommittee without portfolio, trying to help you get
> elected to save ICANN from itself.
>
> Cheers...\Stef
>
> PS: I have no authority here in IFWPland,
> and very likely very little influence as well;-)...
>
>
> At 17:45 -0400 09/09/01, Joanna Lane wrote:
>> Just a note to introduce myself to this list. For those that don't me,
>> please visit http://www.internetstakeholders.com, with particular reference
>> to the ICANN Board Candidate Statement I made yesterday at Montevideo.
>>
>> Is there a subscriber list?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Joanna
>
