So now we keep something because it's an intelligence test? There are far more effective things for that, this is a matter of convenience. If we're going to just become a bunch of elitist pricks I doubt the LUG will be attractive to any newcomers. Might want to consider it being invite only too, and elect reviewers who can either approve or reject new membership requests.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:21 PM, super PJ <[email protected]> wrote: > If people are here to learn more about Linux and can't figure out the reply > vs reply all button then they may not be able to grasp more technical things > like double clicking or why Linux is missing the start button. > On Oct 29, 2011 6:44 AM, "Chip Yglesia" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Brilliant! And unfortunately, too many people don't know how to just reply >> and always use reply all >> >> Regards, >> Chip Yglesia >> [email protected] >> 904.226.4768 >> On Oct 28, 2011 5:42 PM, "super PJ" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> What's wrong with reply to all? Obviously we all know how to use that >>> button. >>> On Oct 28, 2011 1:14 PM, "Joshua Gdovin" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > can we modify the mailing list to have a reply-to: [email protected] ? >>> That >>> > was the community can see replys. Right now if I hit reply it goes to >>> the >>> > individual. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Josh >>> > >>> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive http://marc.info/?l=jaxlug-list&r=1&w=2 RSS Feed http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml Unsubscribe [email protected]
