Hello!

Warren Baker <war...@decoy.co.za> wrote:

> That commit was not pushed to 2.1 (i have done this now). So it will
> be available in the next release. It applies cleanly to 2.1 so you
> should just be able to apply that patch to your existing install.

ok, I'll do that-

> Andreas that TLS option was only aimed at 465 connections where the
> actual transport layer is secured.
> Port 25 and Port 587 are plaintext ports until STARTTLS is sent which
> upgrades the connection from plaintext to a secured one.

Yes, this is my understanding of starttls. I only need it if I enforce
the MTA to smtpd_enforce_tls=yes. In the LAN that's not implicitly
necessary.

> Prior to this commit one could only use port 465 (iirc there might
> still have been a problem). Port 465 is deprecated (way back in 1998)
> as well so its use should be avoided.

ok.

But I have another problem with the notification email of pfsense.

I thougt if I set "Notification E-Mail auth username (optional)"
with the password, some kind of SASl is used. If I set it, the log says:

php: /system_advanced_notifications.php: Could not send the message
 to i...@anup.de -- Error: server does not require authentication

and the connection to the MTA is lost. If I don't set it, the
notification-email is blocked, because the pfsense is considered
a dialup-IP.

Oct 17 11:37:03 delta postfix/smtpd[27273]: connect from 
p54B30B6D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de[84.179.11.109]
Oct 17 11:37:03 delta postfix/smtpd[27273]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from 
p54B30B6D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de[84.179.11.109]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; 
Client host [84.179.11.109] blocked using zen.spamhaus.org; 
http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.179.11.109; from=<i...@anup.de> 
to=<i...@anup.de> proto=ESMTP helo=<hotspot1.anup.lan>
Oct 17 11:37:04 delta postfix/smtpd[27273]: lost connection after DATA from 
p54B30B6D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de[84.179.11.109]
Oct 17 11:37:04 delta postfix/smtpd[27273]: disconnect from 
p54B30B6D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de[84.179.11.109]

I thougt, this SMTP authentication is used to tell the MTA I'm
allowed to send and the check of zen.spamhaus.org comes after that.

  Andreas


> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Andreas Meyer <anme...@anup.de> wrote:
> > Hell!
> >
> > I tried with both, port 587 and port 25. I use
> >
> > 2.1-RELEASE (i386)
> > built on Wed Sep 11 18:16:22 EDT 2013
> > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p11
> >
> > nanobsd (4g)
> >
> >   Andreas
> >
> >
> > Yehuda Katz <yeh...@ymkatz.net> wrote:
> >
> >> As of about a month ago (
> >> https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/1cddd59c4ed2341f87cf58d9b67d45c82ffd99d0)
> >> StartTLS is an independant setting and should work no matter what port you
> >> are using.
> >> I do not know whether that code has made it to a release (can log in to
> >> check from where I am now) and I don't know how much that changed the
> >> behavior from before, but it is probably worth a look.
> >>
> >> - Y
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Andreas Meyer <anme...@anup.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello!
> >> >
> >> > Moshe Katz <mo...@ymkatz.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Andreas Meyer <anme...@anup.de> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hello all!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > php: /system_advanced_notifications.php: Could not send
> >> > > >  the message to i...@anup.de -- Error: 530 5.7.0 Must issue a 
> >> > > > STARTTLS
> >> > > > command first
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Is starttls possible with pfsense?
> >> >
> >> > > There is a checkbox on the "System" -> "Advanced" -> "Notifications" 
> >> > > page
> >> > > that says "Enable SSL/TLS Authentication".  Make sure that box is
> >> > checked,
> >> > > and it should work.
> >> >
> >> > Isn't that checkbox for port 465 only?
> >> > php: /system_advanced_notifications.php: Could not send the message to
> >> >  i...@anup.de -- Error: could not connect to the host "mail.anup.de": ??
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Moshe
> >> >
> >> >   Andreas
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > List mailing list
> >> > List@lists.pfsense.org
> >> > http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> >> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > List mailing list
> > List@lists.pfsense.org
> > http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to