> On Oct 30, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Jeppe Øland <jol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 3 year old Kingston SSDs are not like new Kingston SSDs. > > Agreed. > > On the other hand, I tend to distrust manufacturers that shipped > completely unreliable drives without any thought. > Kingston/OCZ/Crucial are all in this boat for me.
I’m sure I’ve been burned at least as badly by these, and others, and I still buy from them. Samsung 840s are the darling of the “cheap, fast SSD” and they turn out to suck, too: http://www.pcper.com/news/Storage/Samsung-Germany-acknowledges-840-Basic-performance-slow-down-promises-fix > As for Nano, I thought it mounted almost everything as RO and only > changed settings to write down settings changes, and RRD databases etc > on reboots? I think I’ve already responded to this. nano is a > 10 year old “solution” to the problems that existed at the time. http://markmail.org/message/rxe4xfpmdwva7q3e <http://markmail.org/message/rxe4xfpmdwva7q3e> That doesn’t mean it’s a bad solution, but though it’s author is a brilliant individual, he obviously didn’t envision SSD in 2004. Jim
_______________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
