>That's definitely the cable modem's NAT getting confused. If you can get the 
>phones to randomize their source ports on their OpenVPN traffic, that might 
>resolve. I'm not sure if that's possible on those phones. In stock OpenVPN, 
>specifying "lport 0" >in the config will make it choose a random port. I'm not 
>sure if that's configurable for the Yealink phones though. We disable that 
>automatically in our OpenVPN client export for Yealink because they didn't 
>support it at least up until recently.

>If you can change the modem to bridge mode to pass through the public IP to a 
>router of some sort that will properly handle that circumstance, it'll resolve 
>that. That might be hit or miss with consumer-grade routers. A completely 
>default pfSense >config will work fine in that circumstance, as it'll 
>randomize the source ports on its own so the phones don't have to.


Thanks Chris, I've emailed Yealink support but it seems they are "off" until 
mid-next week (Chinese New Year).
Not sure what to do, purchase a 3rd party router to see if solves the problem 
or if I should wait to see what Yealink's answer is first.

Reading up on the modem seems like bridge mode is a little problematic... maybe 
a call to the cable provider first to see options.

Thanks Again,

Chuck
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to