I think you would have a solution with placing an overall limiter on the the wan side with the dest as the public ip. I do not do 1:1 nat but this would be my first guess.
Since you use NAT and private ips that could be handled by LAN rules I would think. On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Steve Yates <st...@teamits.com> wrote: > No we're actually using NAT and private IPs inside the building. We use 1:1 > NAT if a tenant needs a public IP. > > -- > > Steve Yates > ITS, Inc. > > -----Original Message----- > From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of WebDawg > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 2:38 PM > To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <list@lists.pfsense.org> > Subject: Re: [pfSense] Limiters on LAN, WAN > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Steve Yates <st...@teamits.com> wrote: >> To explain my need it's for limiting traffic for several tenants of >> an office building, so each gets up to "n" amount of bandwidth. Each has a >> static IP and their own router. >> >> Maybe I was just overthinking it. Having a limiter on the WAN side >> would therefore limit the connection if a tenant was, let's say, hosting a >> web server and a remote user uploaded a file into the building. >> >> -- >> >> Steve Yates >> ITS, Inc. >> > > I understand what you are talking about. See I do not let any traffic in... > > Are you running the firewall transparent then? > _______________________________________________ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > _______________________________________________ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
