Maybe the newest Alix: https://www.pcengines.ch/apu.htm
Best regards
Kostas
On 28/03/17 16:00, "List on behalf of Eero Volotinen"
<list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org on behalf of eero.voloti...@iki.fi> wrote:
Well, I don't know PPS values :) This is just home gigabit connection for
.. surfing/movies/4K streaming :)
Eero
2017-03-28 15:13 GMT+03:00 Vick Khera <vi...@khera.org>:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Eero Volotinen <eero.voloti...@iki.fi>
> wrote:
>
> > Looking for pfsense hardware that can handle 1000M/1000M internet
> > connection with NAT.
> >
>
> I would recommend at least a Xeon processor base system for that traffic.
> Really, the limit is PPS; do you know what that would be? Any system using
> a Xeon will not be silent. I use a pair of high end custom-built boxes at
> my data center, and they can push this kind of traffic, though my usual
> sustained is only in the 200Mbps range.
>
> The only silent systems I have are based on the Atom C2758 processor, and
I
> do not think those will handle a full gigabit connection at full speed.
> _______________________________________________
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
>
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
