Hello,
On 17-Oct-99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have noted a couple of things about the new 'secure command. I
> wasn't able to set any refinements(?) to the net security. See snipit:
>
>>> secure [
> [ net [
> [ ask all
> [ ]
> [ ]
> ** Script Error: Invalid argument: ask all.
> ** Where: secure [
> net [
> ask all
> ]
> ]
>
> What access types are available for net security? (what exactly does
> rebol consider net activity?)
>
> Also when querying security from rebol, I notice an access type that
> rebol recognizes, but isn't documented in the update.html. This is
> execute. Does the current version (2.1.90) actually use this access
> This prompt gives me no indication of what or why the security level
> is being changed, so if I didn't know better I would not allow it.
> Mebby if rebol would also tell the user what security levels are being
> changed, it would help. (And another thought, if a security level is
> changed in any script but the two startup scripts (rebol.r and user.r
> (hmmm... I'm just noticing the conceptual similarity between
> rebol.r/user.r and Amiga's startup-sequence/user-startup...) might the
> security level only be a 'local' security? Or should this not matter
> because one rebol instance can't run several scripts at once.)
I just thought of another question for security. Is there any consideration
being made for a password authorized security change?
Elliott
