Howdy Elan:
> I believe that these multiple lines in the Received field
> threw header-rules/parse-head off as well.
>
> header-rules/parse-head expects to find a new field on each
> line (I believe, after quickly browsing the code), doesn't
> it?
Good job! Would that everyone was as diligent as you at
finding the source of bugs. Sometimes our bug database
winds up with entries of gigantic run on scripts with the
note "there is a bug in here". Boy--oh--boy! Those are the
best. :-)
> Probably the better solution would be to first check the
> header for conformance with the parse rules, either remove
> lines that do not conform or reformat them so that they do
> and then parse the stuff. If modifications were made, this
> could be reported in an additional Parse-Error-Report field
> in the header.
At some point we'll have to make IMPORT-EMAIL more robust.
So many little dangling items to get worked out with core,
though we're swamped on command. Of course, I'm sure that
if someone fixed IMPORT-EMAIL and sent it in, with a little
due process on our part, we'd certainly include it in the
core and give credit within the source of the code. No one
ever takes my threats seriously... )-: (-:
Cheers--
-jeff
