[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> etc. (you get the idea)? So is it impossible to 'add' capabilities to "read"
> without "overloading" the word so it wouldn't be able to be used as it
> normally is? For instance, if I wanted to be able to say:
>
> read pnm://whatever-real-audio-file
Have a look at system/schemes. You can add you scheme if you know
how to write it...
Ciao,
/Gabriele./
o--------------------) .-^-. (----------------------------------o
| Gabriele Santilli / /_/_\_\ \ Amiga Group Italia --- L'Aquila |
| GIESSE on IRC \ \-\_/-/ / http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/ |
o--------------------) `-v-' (----------------------------------o
