Hi, Ladislav! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Joel, > > I didn't succeed to run your benchmark (not enough memory error > occurred), so I modified it a bit: > [snip] Thanks! I didn't get your note until this morning, so I'll have to wait until the next round to include its times in the benchmark post. As time permits, I'll also start putting versions (including your second one) that use alternate data storage algorithms into the running. This is fun, but I can't let it compete with my day job ;-), so it may take me a while to catch up to all the proposed variations. -jn- (So many posts, so little time!)
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark joel . neely
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark Re: Petr . Krenzelok
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark Re: jeff
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark Re: sterling
- [REBOL] Re: Small admin/report benchmark g . santilli
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark Re:(2) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark Re: lmecir
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark Re:(2) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark Re... joel . neely
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark... jeff
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benc... joel . neely
- [REBOL] DIALECT IN REBOL: w... youpi . technologies
- [REBOL] Small admin/report benchmark... lmecir