David Dixon wrote:
I would probably revise the img tag itself to read something like:
<img src="/images/accessibility.jpg" width="100" height="89" alt="The
imagery of a person on a wheelchair is generally considered a symbol for
accessibility" title="An image of a wheelchair: the symbol for
accessibility">
Sorry, but: for heaven's sake. Can you please demonstrate how that is
*useful to any real user* within the context of the page? If this was a
page outlining different symbols, fine...but here, it's certainly not
needed. As I said, why stop there? Why not explain as well what colours
were used to represent this symbol, etc?
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__________________________________________________________
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************