Andrew Cunningham wrote: > one of the issues with your example is that you set the unicode-bidi > attribute to "embed". If you didn't have the unicode-bidi set to > embed, and you use latin script characters in your test, you'd get > different results in soem browsers compared to the same markup with > arabic characters.
Again, I don't think this is all about latin characters vs. arabic characters. Regardless of the script used, without "unicode-bidi", one does get different results across browsers . In my example, FF keeps all lists LTR while IE shows the second one RTL --- Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
