You can absolutely manage and deploy Windows 10 with ConfigMgr 2012 SP2/R2 SP1, 
supporting the same functionality that exists for Windows 7 and Windows 8/8.1. 
New functionality often requires new code, which is case with the new Windows 
10 servicing model.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 3:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Quick Poll

Isn't that a step away from the "No need to upgrade ConfigMgr to a newer 
version to Deploy & Manage Windows 10" statement that was trumpeted out before?

I remember a session someone held at Barcelona covering that... ;-)

//A

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marable, Mike
Sent: den 4 augusti 2015 12:09
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Quick Poll

Thank you Aaron.  That makes things much clearer.

Mike


From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
on behalf of Aaron Czechowski 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 12:43 AM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Quick Poll

I'm working to refine a blog post that will talk some more about this, trying 
to get it posted soon. This will primarily fit in with the next release of 
ConfigMgr, so you should be evaluating the Technical Previews, and if you are 
deploying or planning to deploy Windows 10 you should also have a plan to 
upgrade to the next version of ConfigMgr.

Think of the "rings" like this: Insiders (rapid, bleeding edge), CB 
(consumer-style, upgrade a couple times a year), CBB (similar to CB but allows 
business to defer the upgrade, but not indefinitely, only for a few months), 
and LTSB (very stable, new features on scale of year[s]). Management of CB/CBB 
and LTSB will integrate with the next version of ConfigMgr, monthly cumulative 
updates as well as the build-to-build upgrades can be managed via 
WSUS/ConfigMgr. You can also point devices at WU, where you are delegating 
control of scheduling to Microsoft (which might work for some customers in some 
situations). Insiders requires this.

Aaron


From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marable, Mike
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 7:13 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Quick Poll

Aaron,

How does this all fit into SCCM?  We manage all of our updating through SCCM.  
Since we're a hospital we have to be very cautious about deploying anything 
which would sound like the LTSB.  On the other hand having the flexibility of 
rolling out new features when they fit our needs would be a huge advantage, 
which sounds like CB or CBB.

The new features that would be coming from Microsoft for CB/CBB, would they be 
available to deploy through WSUS+SCCM or will they be exclusively available 
through Windows Update?

Thanks

Mike Marable
Application Programmer/Analyst Lead
Enterprise Device Engineering and Management
MCSE, MCTS, MCITP, MCSA, MS [ 
Profile<http://www.mycertprofile.com/Profile/5319166625> ] 
[Blog<http://thesystemsmonkey.wordpress.com/>]
--------------------------------------------
"The difficult we do at once. The impossible takes a little longer."
-US Army Corps of Engineers

"It is better to have less thunder in the mouth and more lightning in the hand."
-Apache Proverb

I will rise when I have fallen.

"Unless you try to do something beyond what you have already mastered, you will 
never grow."
-Ralph Waldo Emerson


From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
on behalf of Aaron Czechowski 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, August 3, 2015 at 6:58 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Quick Poll

Same media, both are Current Branch. Difference is in the config. It's in 
Windows Update, Advanced options. "Defer upgrades" is the CB vs CBB setting. 
(see attached)

>From a policy perspective, the CB vs CBB setting is controlled via a new 
>policy under Computer Configuration > Windows Components > Windows Update, 
>"Defer Upgrade"

Aaron



From:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 10:18 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Quick Poll

>From a media perspective how do I know which is CB and which is CB for 
>Business?


From:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Niehaus
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 11:28 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Quick Poll

We believe for most organizations you should use a mix:


·         A small percentage (maybe just your own lab machines) on the Insider 
branch, to see new features as they are being developed.

·         A small percentage on the Current Branch, as early adopters.

·         A significant percentage on the Current Branch for Business, deployed 
in phases.

·         Some percentage (dependent on industry) of mission-critical machines 
on the Long Term Servicing Branch, probably averaging under 20% (could be zero 
for some firms, higher for others).

Maybe that mix works out to <1%, 1%, 80%, and the rest.

Thanks,
-Michael

From:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 8:35 AM
To: SMS List ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [mssms] Quick Poll

When you deploy Windows 10 will you deploy current branch or long term 
servicing?

http://jermsmit.com/windows-10-enterprise-2015-ltsb-whats-that/






________________________________
        John Marcum
            MCITP, MCTS, MCSA
              Desktop Architect
   Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
________________________________

  [H_Logo]


________________________________

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.





**********************************************************
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
used for urgent or sensitive issues



**********************************************************
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
used for urgent or sensitive issues





Reply via email to