You might also consider disabling slow link detection if you don't need it.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Nathan Shelby <[email protected]> wrote: > Any chance you are forcing synchronous application of GPO? Unless > required, you should let them go asynchronously and the user experience > will be better (they'll get a desktop before all policy objects apply) > > Nathan Shelby > Director of Systems Engineering – Quote Wizard <https://quotewizard.com/> > [email protected] / 206-753-2626 > Malo Periculosam Libertatem Quam Quietum Servitium > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Kelsey, John <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> We’re seeing significant logon delays due to the high number of GPOs that >> have to get processed when a user logs in. We’re trying to clean up and >> reduce the number of things that have to happen in order to get the user >> logged on faster. If we block all GPOs in our testing, we’ve been able to >> cut the logon time in half. So either we just have too many GPOs or a >> couple of them for whatever reason is crushing the logon. >> >> >> >> >> >> Is it more efficient to have 200 GPOs that set 1 item in each one? >> >> OR >> >> Is it more efficient to have 1 GPO that sets 200 items? >> >> OR >> >> Does it not make any difference in how long it takes to process? >> >> >> >> Thanks all. >> >> >> >> *************************************** >> *John C. Kelsey* >> >> Penn Highlands DuBois >> (: 814.375.3073 >> 2 : 814.375.4005 >> *: [email protected] >> *************************************** >> >> [image: PHH ESig Logo 150dpi] >> >> >> >> This email and any attached files are sensitive in nature and intended >> solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you >> should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions >> expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those >> of Penn Highlands Healthcare or its affiliates.. Warning: Although >> precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this >> email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that >> arise from the use of this email or attachments. >> >> >
