we are planning on raising the level to 2008 r2 waiting on some stuff with a 
vendor. We have no plans to do this just curious to see if anyone has tried it.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM 1511 and Domain Functional Level



Chaos. Dogs eating cats. Global Warming. A woman in the Whitehouse.

J/K

AD is AD is AD. It’s not supported because Microsoft doesn’t support anything 
2003 related anymore. But nothing has changed AD wise that ConfigMgr does. It 
just creates a few classes when the schema is extended and then creates and 
refreshes a few objects from those classes during normal operations. Thus, 
it’ll work fine.

Why would you leave the core of your entire network in the form of AD on 
something completely unsupported though?

J

From:  <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
on behalf of "Denzik, Josh" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 9:18 AM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [mssms] SCCM 1511 and Domain Functional Level

Anyone know what would happen if your domain functional level was at 2003 and 
you installed SCCM 1511?

-Josh







Reply via email to