Unless they coded stuff to check the level value you shouldn’t run into issues. I would just go for it.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Denzik, Josh Sent: den 11 februari 2016 15:38 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 1511 and Domain Functional Level we are planning on raising the level to 2008 r2 waiting on some stuff with a vendor. We have no plans to do this just curious to see if anyone has tried it. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:32 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM 1511 and Domain Functional Level Chaos. Dogs eating cats. Global Warming. A woman in the Whitehouse. J/K AD is AD is AD. It’s not supported because Microsoft doesn’t support anything 2003 related anymore. But nothing has changed AD wise that ConfigMgr does. It just creates a few classes when the schema is extended and then creates and refreshes a few objects from those classes during normal operations. Thus, it’ll work fine. Why would you leave the core of your entire network in the form of AD on something completely unsupported though? J From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "Denzik, Josh" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 9:18 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [mssms] SCCM 1511 and Domain Functional Level Anyone know what would happen if your domain functional level was at 2003 and you installed SCCM 1511? -Josh
