On 20 November 2012 09:23, Cameron Shorter <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 20/11/2012 6:34 PM, Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas wrote: > >> As for gvSIG, we still don't have support for PostGIS 2.0 (even we >> should). We don't use PostGIS on our default project. So, a database with >> 1.5 would be great if possible. >> >> -- >> Jorge Sanz >> http://es.osgeo.org >> > > Jorge, > I'm unclear about your message here. > Does the gvsig packaged application or quickstart make use of PostGIS? > If so, does gvsig use any functions which might break postgis 2.0? (I'm > guessing that most applications will only be using simple postgis functions) > > The default project and the quickstart use shapefiles, but of course any user might want to connect to a postgis database. Some recent messages at our lists are reporting that gvSIG doesn't work against a PG 2.0 database so it is using some SQL calls that are not present at the new version, or maybe the Java driver must be updated, I don't know. So, if there is any way to have a 1.5 database it will be possible to any user to access it but I can't be strong on asking for this, first because I don't like to put more work on others if I can't help and because I accept that gvSIG has to update its driver and in fact, having 2.0 on the OSGeo Live is a good "push" for us. Best -- Jorge Sanz http://es.osgeo.org
_______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
