Hi Patric,
No need to include this option if you do not have any parts that are
architecture specific.
Best regards,
Angelos
On 07/08/2015 08:00 PM, Patric Hafner | geOps wrote:
Hi Angelos,
our installer for Cartaro is (currently?) independent of the
architecture. Should I include an option to set the build architecture
as argument anyway?
Best regards,
Patric
On 06/25/2015 11:02 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
Hi,
In order to start working on 64 bit installers, we need a way to provide
the build architecture to the installer scripts as arguments.
This pull request shows a working example of such a solution:
https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/pull/9
https://github.com/kalxas/OSGeoLive/commit/db5dd9897fdec3373c82f116cbe503e07abe70ab
So I would like to call the projects listed bellow to update their
installers accordingly.
Thanks,
Angelos
On 06/16/2015 07:25 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
Initial testing results show that 32 bit iso is in great shape, only 1
project has major issues (Ushahidi).
For 64 bit iso things are a bit different. Projects need to provide
patches for installers to use 64bit code.
Projects failing in 64 bit iso:
1. Cartaro
2. Kosmo
3. gpsdrive
4. gvsig
5. mb-system
6. OpenCPN
7. ossim
8. uDig
9. Ushahidi
Best,
Angelos
--
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
