This brings up what seems to me to be an 
interesting question...are merchant marine 
vessels, tug boats, fishing vessels, rigger boats, 
supply boats, Navy vessels, etc., etc., that have 
folks living on them with no other address other 
than maybe a PO box (and I know for a fact it is 
true for at least some of the people on these 
vessels in at least most of the cases I mentioned) 
also considered "liveaboards" with the same 
restrictions that are pushed onto us while at 
anchor, (and I know that at least some of these 
types may anchor or moor for extended times)if not 
why not?

I don't buy the "sewage" argument, as many of the 
above have similar problems at times. Even my very 
small boat can handle that problem effectively, 
given shoreside facilities that are accessible 
with even a dingy.

I don't buy paying taxes either, as many of the 
above may not in some harbors they moor or anchor in.

And for sure I don't buy "athesetics" as old 
waterfront buildings are refurbished into condos 
within full view of working class vessels.

I do buy "control" and the ability to exercise 
same, arbitrarily or not.

Seems to me a double standard with the above that 
could be exploited. -Ken

_______________________________________________
Liveaboard mailing list
[email protected]
To adjust your membership settings over the web 
http://www.liveaboardnow.org/mailman/listinfo/liveaboard
To subscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The archives are at http://www.liveaboardnow.org/pipermail/liveaboard/

To search the archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

The Mailman Users Guide can be found here 
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/index.html

Reply via email to